On 5 March 2024 the government work report proposed an “AI+” initiative for the first time. Compared with the earlier “Internet+”, the phrase moves artificial intelligence from a technology research topic to industrial application, scenario opening and productivity reform.

From Internet+ to AI+

“Internet+” addressed connectivity: moving offline business online. “AI+” addresses decision-making and generation: embedding models into production, services and governance. The policy tools differ accordingly. The former relied on network infrastructure and platform economy; the latter depends more on compute, data supply and open application scenarios.

The report also emphasises new quality productive forces, which shifts attention from model capability to whether a replicable industrial application exists. For AI companies, access to scenarios, compute and data increasingly depends on whether the project has a verifiable compliance basis.

Policy support and obligations arrive together

How to sequence the work

Split compliance into three stages: access and route analysis at project approval; filing, labelling and data licensing before launch; logs, complaint handling and content disposition during operation. Run them in parallel rather than in sequence.

For access and route analysis see business licensing and algorithm filing; for data provenance see data compliance; for protection before disclosure see IP protection.


This article is based on the 2024 government work report delivered on 5 March 2024 and on public information. It is for reference only and does not constitute legal advice.

Geason Law Offices AI Industry Research Group | Reviewed by Ho Qianggao