Shenzhen · An AI Industry-Chain Law Firm

A boutique law firm, deeply rooted
in the AI industry chain
Specialize, Refine, Deepen, Penetrate
From formation, financing, compliance, to global expansion and exit

Founder agreements, equity structures, contracts and employment, IP, financing, filing and data compliance, offshore structures, dispute resolution, M&A exit — not just legal documents, but a real penetration into your technical architecture and business logic.

100% AI Industry Chain
1 One industry, through and through
100+ AI Companies
10+ Jurisdictions
SetupR&DComplianceGlobalExit
SCROLL

Enter by the problem at hand

Five business blocks plus a cross-cutting dispute resolution line — 28 services in total: formation & operations, intellectual property and data, compliance and filing, cross-border and going global, and financing, M&A and exit, with dispute handling set alongside them. Each backed by deliverable, verifiable service packages.

Formation & Operations

Get the entity, equity and base documents right first

Before registration: entity form, place of incorporation and holding vehicle. Before a round: founder agreements, equity split and vesting. When key hires join: option pool and holding platform. On the contract side, SaaS and API agreements, data processing terms, employment, non-compete and tax are built in one pass — get this layer right and later financing and M&A diligence can cite the originals instead of rewriting them.

View all 6 →
Intellectual Property and Data

The assets sit in code, models, data and brand — secure title before talking compliance

Algorithm patents and software copyright, trademarks and brand, open-source licence clearance, trade-secret grading and access trails; on the data side, training-data provenance and licensing chain, a personal-information processing inventory, and graded protection filing. The deliverables are one indexable IP schedule and one data schedule — the same two documents serve financing diligence, overseas review and dispute evidence.

View all 6 →
Compliance and Filing

Align the domestic baseline for launch, procurement and diligence

Before launch: whether ICP/EDI and scope licences are required, plus algorithm filing, LLM registration and an AI content-labelling scheme. When a regulator enquires, a platform audits or criminal exposure surfaces, we handle the investigation and remediation. Deliverables are filing materials that clear review, an operable labelling specification, and internal rules that hold up under inspection.

View all 4 →
Cross-border and Going Global

Align the rules before putting the product on the global shelf

Export-control and sanctions screening first, then the data transfer path (security assessment, standard contract or exemption), then alignment with the EU AI Act, US state law and Southeast Asian rules, and finally the offshore entity, employment and tax. The four tracks run in parallel but cannot be reordered — any one running late blocks launch or collection.

View all 6 →
Financing, M&A and Exit

Put the structure in place before the capital event arrives

Before a round: clean up equity, the option pool, IP and data schedules; at the table: liquidation preference, anti-dilution, redemption and earn-outs. On the M&A side: deal structure, diligence response and drag-along. For a listing: share reform, corporate history and compliance workstreams mapped early. Structure fixed before the term sheet is structure you can still adjust.

View all 4 →

The same rule bites differently, depending on where you sit in the chain

This is why we do not practise as generalists. Each layer has its own compliance starting point, trigger timing and first-order risk — a generic template fails at the first step.

Foundation · Compute & Models

Supply-side compliance is settled before the product ships

Training-data title, LLM filing and safety assessment, compute and Token supply — until these three are resolved, no downstream product or sales arrangement can be built.

Cases in this layer →
Application · Software & Agents

Product form keeps changing; the regulatory triggers converge

Aggregation platforms, video-generation agents, AI digital humans — very different on the surface, yet all land on the same three points: algorithm and generative-service filing, AI content labelling, and personal-information handling rules.

Cases in this layer →
Device · Hardware & Embodied AI

Once there is a physical form, both liability and data location shift

Data is processed inside the device, product liability is split between manufacturer and algorithm provider, and safety assessment for embodied AI has no settled template — this layer has the fewest precedents and is most often misjudged by generic advice.

Cases in this layer →

Going global and capital events do not sit in any single layer — they cut across all three: whether the product may be sold there, and how equity and assets are held. Those follow the question, not the position in the chain.

We don't do everything.

Every link of the AI industry chain — financing, filings, data, going global — Geason has handled and delivered, itself.

100+ AI industry-chain clients
100+ Filing, assessment & due-diligence matters
CAICT TaaS assessment engagement
Whitepaper TaaS compliance whitepaper delivered

Why AI Companies Need a Firm Focused on the AI Industry Chain

The legal challenges facing AI companies are fundamentally different from traditional tech — it requires understanding tech architecture, tracking global regulations, and accumulating industry knowledge. Choosing a firm is essentially choosing their depth of investment in AI.

Dimension
Traditional Full-Service Firms
Geason Law Offices
Industry Focus
Serves all industries; AI is just one client segment; lawyers handle manufacturing, real estate, and finance cases simultaneously
Focused: 100% of time invested in the AI industry chain — all team hours spent on AI regulations, tech architectures, and business models
Service Continuity
Different teams at each stage; setup, financing, and compliance handled by separate departments with handoff gaps
One team, end to end: from founder agreements to exit, same team carries full context — no re-explaining, no handoff loss
Technical Understanding
Applies traditional legal frameworks to AI scenarios; doesn't understand how API aggregation and LLM training affect legal solutions
Tech-savvy: served AI SaaS, LLM startups, and API platforms — deep understanding of how different tech architectures create different legal risk profiles
Regulatory Tracking
Developments tracked by individual lawyers; no firm-level register
Systematic: EU, US, China, and Southeast Asia developments tracked as a standing workstream — aligned internally before they reach engagement documents
Consistency of Position
Incorporation goes to a corporate lawyer, financing to a VC lawyer, compliance to a data lawyer — the same facts get re-explained three times
Financing, IP, and compliance argued by the same people in the same room — one position, stated the same way to investors and regulators
Cost Efficiency
Big-firm brand premium drives up rates; AI company legal budgets only buy basic service
Boutique: no big-firm premium. Same budget buys deeper industry understanding and more focused service

One Team Through the Full Lifecycle, From First Call to Exit

From the first conversation to growth and exit, we have a proven way of working. Each stage has clear deliverables.

01
Initial Consultation & Positioning
Understand your company stage, product architecture, business model, and target markets. 15 minutes to identify what to prioritize now and what can wait. No charge, no pitch.
交付 · Risk Priority Checklist + Action Recommendations
02
Legal Needs Analysis
Based on your lifecycle stage, systematically assess legal risks and priorities. From equity structure to compliance framework to exit planning — we tell you where your biggest risks are and what to tackle first.
交付 · Needs Analysis Report + Risk Heat Map
03
Solution Execution
Build equity structures, draft core contracts, protect IP, manage filing processes, coordinate with regulators, design exit plans — delivery is only one step; we carry it through.
交付 · Agreements + Filing Confirmations + Compliance System
04
Ongoing Tracking & Updates
Regulations change, products iterate, new markets open, new funding rounds start — legal frameworks update in sync. Ours is ongoing counsel, not a one-off project.
交付 · Regulatory Change Alerts + Framework Updates

AI Legal Developments, Our Ongoing Research

Weekly industry briefs and regular in-depth practice guides. Practice research for AI companies, not academic surveys.

Hard problems reasoned through. Regulatory positions pinned down.

Every case states three things — which obligation was triggered, what we judged, and what was delivered.

View all published case studies →

A published subset only — the full engagement record covers 100+ companies across the AI industry chain.

A knowledge base organized by compliance domain

Six compliance domains, each mapping to a real regulatory question you will face — open a domain for practice guides, regulation analysis, checklists and updates.

AI Compliance Whitepapers & Practice Resources

Our research team continuously produces industry reports and operational guides. Leave your email for the latest research.

Get Full Reports & Latest Research

Whitepapers, regulation analysis, and compliance toolkits are continuously updated. Leave your info to get them first.

By submitting, you agree to receive Geason research updates. We never share your email, and you can unsubscribe at the bottom of every email.

Frequently Asked Questions

We are not an AI company — AI is just part of our business. Do you take us on?
Yes. The test is not whether a company calls itself AI, but whether AI has entered its product, data or delivery. Manufacturers, healthcare, financial and content businesses that embed models face the same issues as AI-native companies: training-data provenance, liability for model output, algorithm filing, content labelling and cross-border data. Only the priority differs, and we sequence it against your business model first.
What do you actually do for an AI company, from incorporation to exit?
Twenty-eight services in five business blocks: formation and operations, intellectual property and data, compliance and filing, cross-border and going global, and financing, M&A and exit, plus a cross-cutting dispute resolution line. From founder agreements, equity incentives, contracts and employment, through IP, filing, offshore structures and financing terms, to M&A exit — handled by one team, with no switching firms or teams.
Our company was just incorporated. What should we do first?
Entity and equity structure, founder agreements, IP ownership, and options for key employees. Getting these wrong at formation turns every later step into a correction. Filing and data compliance usually start once the product has a defined shape and a launch date — a different rhythm, not something to pile on early.
The product has not launched yet. Is it too early for compliance?
It is a question of order, not timing. Do first what is tied to market access: business licences, algorithm and model filing, and a content-labelling scheme. Systemic documents can wait until the product stabilises, which avoids rewriting them. Launching first and filing later means reworking the product, contracts and marketing materials, possibly with a suspension order — a higher price.
How long do algorithm filing and LLM registration take, and what happens without them?
With complete materials they proceed in batches, measured in months; substantive product changes require a change filing. Without them the direct consequences are a remediation order, removal or suspension, and app stores and cloud providers will ask for the filing number. In financing and overseas expansion, a missing filing is repriced in diligence.
Our training data was scraped and the model is open source. Can we commercialise it directly?
Two separate questions. On data: lawful provenance and scope of licence, whether personal information was removed, and whether anti-scraping measures or platform terms were circumvented. On the model: commercial-use terms of the open-source licence, model-card restrictions, and allocation of liability for outputs. Both can be used, but the records must be verifiable — these are the two items most often probed in diligence and hardest to reconstruct later.
Investors want data compliance and IP diligence. What should we prepare?
Three schedules: an IP schedule (patents, software copyright, trademarks, open-source components and licences), a data schedule (sources, storage location, transfer paths, personal-information processing activities), and the chain of title (IP ownership of founders, employees and contractors). Assembled into one indexable file, diligence drops from two weeks to days, and you are less likely to accept repurchase and warranty terms under pressure.
We plan to sell overseas. Which market first, and in what order?
Start from where revenue comes from, not from where rules are strictest. The usual order: export-control and sanctions screening (can it be sold) → data transfer path (can the data go) → market access and regulation (EU AI Act, US state law, Southeast Asian rules) → offshore entity, employment and tax (can you collect locally). They run in parallel, but the order cannot be reversed.
We have been complained about, sued, or taken down by a platform. How do you step in?
Stop the loss first, allocate liability second: preserve evidence and logs, determine whether this is content infringement, unfair competition or a contract dispute, and handle the platform appeal and regulatory enquiry in parallel. In AI cases the evidence decides the boundary — model version, training data, generation records, whether labelling was in place. Dispute resolution is a cross-cutting line; no separate litigation team is needed.
How do we engage you, how are fees set, and can we instruct you on a single matter?
Either a single matter or a retainer. Single matters are quoted per project, with scope, deliverables and timeline fixed before engagement; retainers are annual packages covering day-to-day advice, contract review and a set number of special matters. Most clients start with one concrete problem — a filing, a round, an offshore structure — and decide on a longer relationship afterwards.

Let's Talk About Your AI Company

Whatever stage your AI company is at — from founder agreements to exit planning — we've been there before. Schedule a 15-minute initial consultation, no charge, no pitch.

Schedule Consultation
Shenzhen
contact@jianshenlaw.com
+86 188 2288 0959
WeChat: GeasonLaw

简深律师事务所 © 2025-2026 Geason Law Offices · All Rights Reserved

粤ICP备2026073764号-1

微信扫码预约沟通
扫描二维码,添加简深律所微信
简深律所微信二维码
微信扫码 · 即时响应
也可以邮件 contact@jianshenlaw.com
或致电 188 2288 0959